"Are you Hive? No"All employees of DoorDoor"Min Heejin's Nth Offense"Anger
Aug 15, 2024
|
When CEO Min Hee-jin refuted former employee B's controversy over concealing sexual harassment in the company in a lengthy article, B posted a lengthy article refuting Min's claim, which is intensifying the controversy.
On the 14th, Mr. B said, "'B' is a former employee of Audor who is truly angry at the behavior of continuous Nth harm with CEO Min Hee-jin's continued false claims and new defamation-filled position.'" B said. "Without mentioning any violations of neutrality, double-blaming, or deception as a representative, it is as expected to cover up the nature of the case, water down and blur the issue with the claims I expected, such as selective explanation, underperformance, and salary reduction." In the meantime, he posted a lengthy article saying, `Please clarify, correct, and apologize for the three issues raised by himself,' `I sincerely point out the CEO's watering behavior and poor false claims that he is a low performer.'
<1>The case was cleared of charges and he was not biased
B is "The duty and responsibility of investigating and handling in-house harassment and sexual harassment cases rests with CEO Min Hee-jin, who is the CEO of Adore, where I workedHe pointed out that it is legally the representative of the procedure to take the final disciplinary action against the Theodore employee. He then returned the criticism he received with a high annual salary, saying, "Neutracy and arbitration are originally legal things to do from the beginning, and that's what you have to do while you're in the position of a high-paid CEO." He also demanded that `Please mention and explain the back-and-forth efforts of Executive A to make him innocent and the biased behavior of refusing to warn the perpetrator as the final decision-maker.'
<2> a claim that it is a retaliatory false report
"Representative Min asked us to stop spreading false information and blurring the issue. Seven cases of harassment in the workplace and one case of sexual harassment were all submitted along with the grounds, and executive A admitted the wrongdoing and apologized for the sexual harassment case through Kakao Talk with the CEO."He disclosed the full text of the report at the time, saying that there was no false information in his report.
|
"It is illegal to disclose an employee's salary and arbitrarily disclose all 40 percent of his salary reduction without my consent," B said. "I was not surprised at all because I knew Min's behavior would be like that, but Min Hee-jin's behavior of talking about my salary and then revealing the reason for the salary reduction to the public is rude and arrogant behavior that cannot be done legally in common sense." He has been highly rated by all the companies he has worked for, and he has already received more than the salary he received at Adore three years ago, excluding incentives, and has been offered a job at the same level by other companiesIt is illegal to arbitrarily cut salaries without legal disciplinary procedures or prior notice. There is a limit set by the law even when a salary is reduced through disciplinary action. In common sense, a cut to the level of cutting 40% by almost half means resigning on your own.
|
Regarding Representative Min's criticism of his/her underachiever, a total of 5 participants participated in the 6-month probationary evaluation, and all but A executives who worked with him/her for a month made the final evaluation with active recommendations and recommendations`"Most of the representatives of Min have never worked at home and come to work. Even if I am a direct staff member, I have met three or four times except for external meetings. Can a representative who doesn't even go to work evaluate each employee's work capabilities fairly and faithfully?"
"I'm really bad at my job. Will so many people contact me to sympathize with me and support me?" he said. "You described me as a business leader. When was I given the authority to be a leader?" I was a staff member without a team member under me."
He also said that he had arranged a lunch meeting with an important advertiser to be caught at Doror and that he had been constantly being lectured for hours with a desire for both sides since then. He said, "It makes me laugh that he was unfamiliar with the inscription and work." She added "It's absurd that I'm going to have to cut my salary by 40 percent and put up with bullying because I got help from members to do better with the advertising job I suddenly took on with tinkering with."
Finally, B demanded three explanations, saying, `The essence of the case is Min's cover-up of workplace harassment, public deception through lies and weaving, defamation through disclosure of disagreeable kakaotalk and context editing.' He also refuted CEO Min Hee-jin's article with a one-line summary, saying, "Are you Hive?He answered "No" to the question ".
lyn@sportschosun.com
