A former employee of Audor, who claimed sexual harassment damage, opened his mouth again.
Mr. A posted a lengthy statement on his personal account on the 15th, saying, `All employees of Adoreau are truly angry at CEO Min Hee-jin's continued false claims and the continuous N-th harm with new defamation statements.'
Mr. A said, `Neutracy and arbitration are things that should have been done as CEO from the beginning, and please mention and explain the back-and-forth efforts made by Executive B to bring out the charges and the biased behavior of refusing to warn the perpetrator as the final decision-maker. Based on the Labor Standards Act, we will legally respond to inappropriate measures to report workplace harassment."
Subsequently, "7 reports of workplace harassment and 1 report of sexual harassment were all well-founded and there was no false information. Executive B has already admitted his mistake and apologized. Hive said it was scheduled to re-investigate, so it delivered 11 additional reports and evidence. We will investigate with the help of external agencies as well as Hive."
"It is illegal to disclose an employee's annual salary, to arbitrarily reduce the salary by 40%, and to disclose the reason without consent," Mr. A said. "A total of five people participated in the six-month probationary evaluation, and all but Officer B made the final evaluation as 'highly recommended' and 'recommended'." He also claimed that CEO Min, who mainly worked from home, was unable to faithfully evaluate each employee's work capabilities, and that even Audor's client company was sending messages of support.
"The essence of the case is CEO Min's cover-up of workplace harassment, public deception through lies and weaving, defamation through disclosure of Kakao Talk and contextual editing that did not agree," Mr. A said. "All I wanted was a false correction and a public apology. I can't say a word of that easy apology. I'll see you in court and in the labor office in the future."
Last month, allegations arose that CEO Min tried to cover up a sexual harassment case in the door. In response, CEO Min explained that the case had already been investigated at the Hive level and ended without charges, adding that he rather comforted A, reprimanded B, and acted as a mediator.
In response, A revealed that CEO Min sided with executive B, refused to take warning measures to prevent a recurrence, and encouraged him to sue A for innocence. Then, representative Min published dozens of statements. It is suspected that A, who was a high-paid person but was vindictive of receiving a low personnel evaluation due to his lack of work ability, made a false report in retaliation. He also made a statement to the effect that A's revelation was a kind of scheme to dismiss his/her representative.
A apologized to both Hive and B executives, but CEO Min rather 'Are you Hive?He vented his anger by saying that he had committed a second offense, sending 77 kakaotalk messages. And announcing a lengthy position again. Attention is focusing on what their truth will be.
silk781220@sportschosun.com
