Odor requests legal professionals criticizing Hive to guarantee the right to object to it "Min Hee-jin's dismissal, the unique authority of the board of directors"
Sep 13, 2024
|
On the 13th, Odor asked the company to publish the following objection to the article under the article 'Hive, a lawless law, and a law enforcement agent' that was reported by a media outlet on the 13th. This is to exercise the right to object to protect corporate value and artist IP (Intellectual Property Rights)."
Adore said "It is the unique authority of the Board that the Board has replaced the CEO. According to the management judgment, the board of directors may replace and implement the CEO at any time with its own resolution""We regret that we did not provide inquiries or counter-arguments to the company while criticizing one party to the dispute only for the remarks of a specific legal professional. "
Above all, the lawyer in question was the legal representative for submitting a petition for support from former representative Min Hee-jin at the time of the provisional injunction lawsuit. For uncomfortable and unfair reporting, we ask you to guarantee the right to object when reporting related to us," he added.
Earlier, Lee Hyun-gon, a lawyer at Saeol Law Office, said in his personal account that `Hive's continued bringing up legal issues such as breach of trust, extortion of the company, and concealment of sexual harassment against Min Hee-jin, former CEO of Airdo, is not to achieve results. The main purpose in itself is to continue to drag on legal issues. So when one is done, another issue is brought up again."
He said "Why would I file a lawsuit that the law firm Kim & Chang can't do, but I'm saying this without knowing that it's aimed at creating an issue and continuing to create a conflict state. be a high-quality legal adviser""They don't follow the law and do what they want because they are in a state of conflict." It is a method mainly performed by pre-sale shopping malls or redevelopment associations. I don't think it's a good idea to use the law in this way."
In addition, lawyer Lee Hyun-gon "Dismissed (former CEO Min Hee-jin) at the general shareholders' meeting because it was ruled that the dismissal of (former CEO Min Hee-jin) was a violation of the contract between shareholders, so the board of directors dismissed him this time." Isn't the will of the board of directors the will of Hive. It's just a blindfolded whine. "If you go on a barrage of supplies like this, ordinary people can't stand it and go out. I don't think that's justice. If you watch something like this, you'll get a feeling of supporting Min Hee-jin, the former representative.
soulhn1220@sportschosun.com
