UN Choi Jung-won admits affair...Should I get a ticket for a man who is considered to be a witness?
Jan 06, 2025
|
A media outlet reported on the 6th that the court judged the meeting between Choi Jung-won and her female acquaintance A was cheating.
According to the report, the third part of the Seoul Family Court filed a divorce suit filed by A against her husband B on the 4th of last month "During the marriage period, A lied to B that he was going to meet another friend on May 15, 2022, met Choi Jung-won for brunch in Apgujeong, and on May 27, 2022, he met Choi Jung-won at the Han River Park and touched her by drinking wine and holding hands or arm-in-arm."I judged.
In addition, "I went into Choi Jung-won's house alone and spent time, and on June 18, 2022, he told B that he was going to play with his son, and left his son alone in the game room, met Choi Jung-won on an exercise date and cheated. The conflict intensified when Mr. B found out about this around June of that year. The main responsibility for the breakdown of the marriage lies with Mr. A, who ruled that Mr. B should pay 30 million won in alimony.
In December 2022, B filed a lawsuit for compensation for 100 million won, claiming that Choi Jeong-won cheated with A. The trial was delayed with the aim of watching the results of the divorce lawsuit between A and B, but it was ruled that the cause of the breakdown of the marriage was cheating in the divorce lawsuit between A and B, putting Choi Jung-won at a disadvantage.
However, A appealed against the first trial's ruling, and Choi Jeong-won also denied the allegations of an affair and applied for A as a witness.
Choi Jung-won said, "A is a younger brother who was close to his family when he was in his 20s, so he only had a comfortable meeting with old memories and never did anything to cross the line."
The trial is scheduled to take place on the 21st.
In addition, Choi Jung-won sued B on charges of defamation teachers, threats, insults, and violations of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communication Network Utilization and Information Protection, and B also appealed for defamation, but the police concluded that both were not guilty.
silk781220@sportschosun.com
