"Lee Moo-song ♥" Noh Sa-yeon, perilla leaf → Japchae debate starts.."I'm in the mood for catching Japchae". (Tambi)
Jan 14, 2025
|
|
In the true story of Channel A's life-oriented detective drama 「Detective 24:00」, which aired on the 13th (Mon), the rich detectives tracked down the representatives of famous dress companies in Gangnam who caused hundreds of couples to lose more than 1 billion won in damage. According to an interview with a branch official, the amount of damage has already varied from about 20 million won to as much as 50 million won, as employees' severance pay and salaries have already been pushed back. The factory president who has traded for nine years since the company's CEO started working was "About 300 million won behind." The shoe factory, the dress shirt factory, the affiliated store...There's nothing I didn't suffer from," he said, venting his anger, "I let him go even if he was like a son, but he betrayed me at the end."
The father-son detectives left to find representatives who went into hiding at the address they got from the factory boss. CEO A, who met after a long incubation, said "We were about to attract investment, but it finally broke down the day before. If we had received more new customers without stopping our business, the number of victims would have increased." He, who is currently continuing his living as a daily worker, also denied the damage estimated by the victims, saying, `It will be about 400 to 500 million won.'
In addition, CEO B denied that he had spent money only for the operation of the company, not for private use, saying "The capital erosion situation continued" If he should not have received money from new customers" Lawyer Nam Seong-tae said "The key is whether there was any intention of deceiving the fraudulent person", but "It is difficult to judge who is right with only the information now." It is true that it is irresponsible regardless of legal responsibility." And the representatives, who also denied rumors that they were planning another 2 billion won project, said "We will meet with the victims through a lawyer." However, there was no replay of the two representatives until the broadcast.
Meanwhile, in the detective real-life drama 'Case Notebook - Everyone Has Secrets', Defconn named 'Chuncheon's IU(?)'Flower Deer' Noh Sa-yeon came as a guest. The true story of the day began with the pursuit of her husband's affair commissioned by his wife, an executive at a large company. One day, the client found a suspicious conversation with a high school girl on her husband's phone and looked for a detective. But the student turned out to be the daughter of her father-in-law's carer. Still, the client, who was not relieved, continued to investigate the affair. Noh Sa-yeon, the originator of the 'perilla leaf debate', said, `Don't catch the caregiver's miscellaneous vegetables when the husband in the story catches the caregiver's miscellaneous vegetables instead. I'm really in a bad mood(?)," he said, bursting into laughter. "Is it okay for me to be this excited when I come out on 'Tambi'?"
And during the investigation, the detective shocked to find that the caregiver was known as a 'daughter-in-law' in the neighborhood. When the client questioned her husband, he shouted confidently, `Didn't you not come to your in-laws for three years, you did what you wanted because you were so upset about 'self filial piety'.' However, the client had a history of barely taking care of, raising children, and working when his mother was battling cancer in the past. To such a client, the husband was hoping to take care of his in-laws. Eventually, the client shouted 'Self filial piety', and even if he couldn't go to his in-laws' house for three years, he tried his best to get a caregiver for his father-in-law, who was alone, and deliver food.
Shortly after, the father-in-law went missing due to loss of contact. It was revealed that even the commercial real estate he owned was sold for 300 million won. The case changed rapidly after it was discovered that his father-in-law had even registered his marriage with a caregiver after his honeymoon in Hawaii, while the frequent nursing care worker's 'extortion of cash against the elderly' was suspected. The father-in-law decided to be a family member with a caregiver who took care of him sincerely, and the disposal of his property was also a source of cash for his cruise and his high school stepdaughter's studies. The detective's inquest revealed that the two were also sincere with each other. In the end, the father-in-law concluded that he was living a new relationship and 'life of his own', and he finished close to insulation with his son and his wife.
tokkig@sportschosun.com
